← Back to Resources

Microbial Catalysts vs. Live Cultures: What's the Difference?

By Merlyn Snider, Co-Founder

When it comes to biological soil treatment, there are two fundamentally different approaches: introducing live microorganisms into the soil, or using catalysts that stimulate the microbes already there. Both work. But they work differently, and choosing the right one depends on your situation.

The Catalyst Approach

Microbial catalysts don't contain living organisms. Instead, they provide the nutrients, enzymes, and biochemical signals that activate dormant soil microbes. Think of it as fuel for your existing soil biology.

The advantages are practical: catalysts are shelf-stable, easy to store, and can be tank-mixed with existing fertilizer programs without worrying about killing live organisms. They work with whatever microbial community is already adapted to your specific soil conditions.

The Live Culture Approach

Live microbial products introduce specific beneficial organisms directly into the soil. This can be especially effective when native soil biology has been severely depleted by contamination, chemical overuse, or physical disturbance.

The trade-off is logistics: live cultures have a limited shelf life (typically 4 months), require specific temperature storage (40-90 degrees F), and can be killed by pesticides or harsh environmental conditions. They work best when applied during cooler parts of the day and when soil conditions are favorable for colonization.

When to Use Which

Choose a catalyst when:

• Your soil has existing microbial communities that need activation
• You need shelf-stable products that integrate with your current program
• You're applying alongside chemical fertilizers or pesticides
• Consistent, repeatable results across large acreage are critical
• Storage and logistics simplicity matter

Choose live cultures when:

• Native soil biology has been severely depleted or destroyed
• You need immediate microbial inoculation from day one
• Specific microbial strains are required for a particular contaminant or crop
• You can manage cold-chain logistics and timely application

Use both when:

Many operations achieve the best results by combining both approaches. Live cultures establish a robust microbial population, while catalysts provide ongoing fuel to keep that population active and productive. This is especially effective in remediation projects where contaminated soil needs both new organisms and the biochemical support to sustain them.

← Back to Resources

The $19B Opportunity: Agricultural Biologicals in 2026

By Dan Grams, Co-Founder

The agricultural biologicals market has hit an inflection point. Valued at $9-9.5 billion in 2025, the sector is projected to reach $18.75 billion by 2030 and $35-38 billion by 2034. That's a compound annual growth rate of 14-16%, making it one of the fastest-growing segments in agriculture.

What's driving this acceleration? Three converging forces that aren't going away.

1. Fertilizer Economics Have Changed

Fertilizer costs have increased 20-50% since 2022, driven by energy costs, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical factors. For farmers operating on thin margins, every dollar of input cost matters. Microbial products that improve nutrient use efficiency by 15-25% represent a direct path to better economics.

2. The Giants Are Validating the Space

When BASF, Corteva, Bayer, and Syngenta all start acquiring biologicals companies, it tells you something about where the industry is headed:

• Corteva acquired Stoller (~$1.2B) and Symborg, reporting $476M in biologicals revenue for 2024
• FMC is targeting $2B in biologicals by 2033, with Plant Health growing 33% year-over-year
• Syngenta acquired Valagro for its microbial platform
• Bayer extended its partnership with Ginkgo Bioworks for nitrogen-fixing microbes
• Pivot Bio raised $430M at a $2B valuation for its nitrogen-replacing microbials

This M&A activity validates the science and the market. It also creates opportunity for specialized producers who can supply the active ingredients these larger players need.

3. Sustainability Mandates Are Real

From carbon credit programs to ESG reporting requirements, the pressure on agriculture to reduce chemical inputs is intensifying. Biological products offer a path to meeting sustainability goals without sacrificing productivity. In fact, meta-analysis data shows microbial treatments delivering an average 17.9% yield improvement, with protein extracts and microbial consortia achieving 26-30%.

What This Means for Growers and Distributors

The opportunity is straightforward: biological products that deliver measurable ROI are no longer niche. They're becoming a standard part of progressive farming operations. For distributors and formulators, adding biologicals to your product line isn't just about capturing a trend. It's about meeting a demand that's already here.

Key market segments

• Row crops (corn, wheat, cotton, sorghum) represent the largest addressable market but currently only receive 55% of microbial applications. The gap is the opportunity.
• Specialty crops (fruits, vegetables, herbs) are early adopters with higher willingness to pay for biological inputs.
• Turf management (golf courses, sports fields) spend $500K-$2M annually on turf programs and are increasingly moving to biologicals.

← Back to Resources

Bioremediation 101: How Microbes Clean Contaminated Soil

By Josh Haley, Co-Founder

Bioremediation uses naturally occurring microorganisms to break down or neutralize contaminants in soil and groundwater. It's not new science. Microbes have been degrading organic compounds for billions of years. What's changed is our ability to accelerate the process and apply it at scale.

How It Works

Soil microorganisms, primarily bacteria and fungi, use contaminants as a food source. Through their natural metabolic processes, they break complex pollutants into simpler, less toxic compounds. The end products are typically carbon dioxide, water, and biomass.

There are two main approaches:

• Biostimulation: Adding nutrients or catalysts to stimulate existing soil microbes to degrade contaminants faster. This is what microbial catalysts do.
• Bioaugmentation: Introducing specific microbial strains that are particularly effective at breaking down target contaminants.

What Bioremediation Can Treat

• Petroleum hydrocarbons (gasoline, diesel, crude oil, jet fuel) account for 38% of bioremediation projects
• Chlorinated solvents (TCE, PCE) from industrial operations
• Heavy metals (lead, chromium, arsenic, cadmium) from mining and manufacturing
• Agricultural chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, excess fertilizers)
• PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) from coal, petroleum, and combustion
• Emerging contaminants: PFAS remediation is an active research frontier

The Cost Advantage

Bioremediation's biggest selling point beyond environmental outcomes is economics. In-situ bioremediation (treating soil in place) eliminates or dramatically reduces the need for excavation, transportation, and disposal, which are the major cost drivers in traditional remediation.

The US Remediation Market

The domestic bioremediation market is $7.4 billion (2025), projected to reach $20.9 billion by 2034. In-situ microbial technologies hold approximately 54% market share. The demand is driven by:

• 1,300+ active EPA Superfund sites
• 8,000 contaminated Department of Defense areas
• 109,000 underground storage tank sites
• 5,000+ voluntary cleanup sites per year through state programs
• Growing PFAS contamination awareness (44,000+ identified sites)

How Pilot Programs Work

For contaminated sites, the standard approach is a 3-6 month pilot program that measures efficacy before committing to full-scale treatment:

1. Site characterization: Baseline contaminant levels, soil type, and existing microbial populations
2. Treatment design: Injection wells or plot-based application with untreated control areas
3. Monitoring: Regular sampling for contaminant reduction, geochemistry shifts, and microbial population changes
4. Results analysis: Target is 90%+ contaminant reduction with documented cost comparison to traditional methods

← Back to Resources

Your Soil's Hidden Workforce: A Guide to the Soil Microbiome

By Merlyn Snider, Co-Founder

A single teaspoon of healthy soil contains between 100 million and 1 billion microorganisms, representing thousands of different species. These bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and other microbes form a complex underground network that's essential to everything happening above ground.

What Soil Microbes Actually Do

Soil microorganisms perform several critical functions that directly affect crop productivity and soil health:

Nutrient Cycling

Microbes convert organic matter and mineral nutrients into forms that plant roots can absorb. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria convert atmospheric N2 into plant-available ammonium. Phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria release locked-up phosphorus from soil minerals. Without microbial activity, most soil nutrients would remain inaccessible to plants regardless of how much fertilizer you apply.

Organic Matter Decomposition

Fungi and bacteria break down crop residues, animal matter, and other organic materials into humus. This process releases nutrients, improves soil structure, and builds the organic matter that gives healthy soil its dark color and water-holding capacity.

Disease Suppression

A diverse soil microbiome competes with and suppresses plant pathogens. Beneficial microbes colonize root surfaces, forming a protective barrier. Some produce antibiotics or enzymes that directly inhibit pathogenic organisms. When soil biology is depleted, disease pressure increases.

Soil Structure

Fungal hyphae physically bind soil particles into aggregates, creating the pore structure that allows air and water movement. Bacterial biofilms and exudates act as biological glue. Without active soil biology, soil structure degrades, leading to compaction, poor drainage, and erosion.

Why Soil Biology Gets Depleted

• Chemical overuse: Excess synthetic fertilizers, particularly high-salt formulations, can suppress microbial activity
• Pesticide exposure: Some herbicides and fungicides harm beneficial soil organisms along with their targets
• Tillage: Physical disruption breaks fungal networks and exposes microbial communities to UV and desiccation
• Monoculture: Growing the same crop repeatedly reduces microbial diversity
• Contamination: Industrial pollutants, petroleum, and heavy metals can devastate soil biology

Restoring the Microbiome

The good news is that soil biology is resilient. With the right inputs, suppressed microbial communities can be reactivated relatively quickly. Microbial catalysts work by providing the biochemical signals and nutrients that dormant soil microbes need to resume activity. Field data shows measurable improvements in microbial biomass and diversity within a single growing season.

← Back to Resources

White-Label Biologicals: Adding Microbial Products to Your Line

By Dan Grams, Co-Founder

Demand for biological crop inputs is growing at 14-16% annually. Agricultural distributors, fertilizer blenders, and specialty formulators are increasingly hearing from customers who want biological options. But building a microbial product line from scratch requires R&D investment, fermentation infrastructure, and regulatory expertise that most companies don't have in-house.

White-label partnerships solve this problem.

How White-Label Biologicals Work

In a white-label arrangement, a microbial producer (like ElixirGrow) supplies bulk biological products that a distributor or formulator packages and sells under their own brand. The supply chain looks like this:

1. Strain development: Proprietary microbial strains are isolated, tested, and optimized for specific applications
2. Production: Liquid or solid-state fermentation at scale, with quality control for consistent cell counts and viability
3. Custom formulation: Products are tailored to the partner's specifications, such as compatibility with specific fertilizer bases, concentration levels, and application methods
4. Bulk delivery: Totes, drums, or other bulk formats shipped to the partner for packaging under their label

What Distributors Want

Based on conversations with agricultural distributors across the US, the requirements for a white-label biological partner are consistent:

• Proven ROI data: Field trials showing 5-15% yield or nutrient efficiency gains that make the product an easy sell
• Supply reliability: Consistent quality and volume without viability loss during storage or transport
• Ease of use: Tank-mix compatible products with simple application rates and clear labeling
• Regulatory compliance: Products registered as soil amendments at the state level with clean labeling
• Sustainability story: Data on reduced chemical inputs, carbon sequestration, or heavy metal reduction that supports ESG reporting

The 90-Day Pilot Model

The most effective path to a white-label deal isn't a sales pitch. It's a pilot program. A structured 90-day trial on the partner's target crops or soil conditions produces the localized data they need to commit:

• Treated vs. untreated control plots on representative acreage
• Pre- and post-application soil testing
• Yield measurements at harvest
• Documented cost per acre vs. conventional inputs
• Joint review of results with the partner's agronomists or technical staff

← Back to Resources

Field Results: What Bioremediation Actually Achieves

By Josh Haley, Co-Founder

The question environmental contractors and site owners always ask is: does bioremediation actually work at scale? The answer, backed by decades of field data, is yes. Here are documented results from real remediation projects.

Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation

Petroleum contamination is the most common application for bioremediation, accounting for 38% of all projects. Microbes naturally metabolize hydrocarbons, and microbial catalysts accelerate this process significantly.

• Crude oil spill (P. aeruginosa treatment): 96% TPH degradation in 60 days
• Kerosene-contaminated soil (biopile method): 88%+ reduction from 4,000 to under 500 mg/kg in 93 days, at roughly one-third the cost of physicochemical treatment
• Pipeline spill (biosorbent + nutrient amendment): Significant TPH and PAH reduction within 6 months, lower cost than excavation and disposal

Pesticide and Agricultural Chemical Remediation

PAH Contamination

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from coal, petroleum, and combustion sources respond well to bioremediation. Composting-based bioaugmentation achieved 74% average reduction across all 16 EPA priority PAHs, outperforming biostimulation alone (46%).

Mining Site Remediation

Mining operations generate some of the most challenging remediation scenarios, including acid mine drainage and heavy metal contamination. The scale of spending reflects the scale of the problem:

• Newmont: $803M in remediation spending (2025), with $850M estimated for 2026
• Freeport-McMoRan: $387M in historical remediation costs
• Teck Resources: $120M+ on selenium treatment alone

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are increasingly used for acid mine drainage, converting dissolved metals into insoluble sulfides that can be safely contained. Microbial catalysts enhance SRB activity, improving treatment rates and reducing chemical amendment costs.

Key Metrics That Convince Decision-Makers

Based on successful pilot programs, the metrics that move projects from pilot to full-scale are:

• Contaminant reduction: 90%+ (mass flux drop proves efficacy)
• Geochemistry shift: Decreased dissolved oxygen, increased iron/manganese/sulfate confirms active bioremediation
• Microbial markers (qPCR): 10x increase in target organism populations proves biological mechanism
• Cost comparison: Documented savings of one-third to two-thirds versus traditional methods